الگوی حسابداری زیست محیطی شرکت های فولاد با رویکرد نظریه داده بنیاد چندوجهی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران.
2 گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
با توجه به هدف پژوهش که ارائه الگوی حسابداری زیست محیطی شرکت های فولاد می باشد از طریق مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته و با رویکرد اکتشافی، داده ها جمع آوری گردید. جامعه آماری شامل خبرگان حرفه حسابداری مدیریت که شامل حسابداران مدیریت و مدیران مالی شرکت های فولاد و اساتید حسابداری که پژوهشی پیرامون مسائل زیست محیطی انجام داده اند، می باشند. روش نمونه گیری به صورت هدفمند و گزینشی می باشد. نمونه آماری در بخش کیفی 13 خبره و در بخش کمی جهت اعتبار سنجی الگوی پژوهش 35 خبره بود. در ارتباط با الگوی حسابداری زیست محیطی شرکت های فولاد با رویکرد نظریه داده بنیاد چندوجهی دو بُعد، چهار مولفه و سی و پنج شاخص شناسایی گردید. بُعد درون سازمانی حسابداری سبز با مولفه فردی و مولفه سازمانی، بُعد برون سازمانی حسابداری سبز با مولفه اجتماعی و مولفه نظارت و ارزیابی شناسایی گردید. پژوهش فوق که در زمینه حسابداری زیست‌محیطی برای شرکت‌های فولاد انچام گردیده، می‌تواند به توسعه ابزارهای مدیریتی، شاخص‌های عملکرد و روش‌های گزارشگری زیست محیطی کمک نماید که به نوبه خود، صنعت فولاد را در مسیر پایداری و مسئولیت‌پذیری بیشتر هدایت می‌نماید. این پژوهش‌ها همچنین می‌توانند به بهبود عملکرد زیست‌محیطی صنعت فولاد کمک نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Environmental Accounting Model of Steel Companies with Multifaceted Grounded Theory Approach

نویسندگان English

Shima Mollashahri 1
Javad Mohamadimerh 2
1 Department of Accounting, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.
2 Department of Accounting, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

According to the purpose of the research, which is to present an environmental accounting model of steel companies, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and an exploratory approach. The statistical population includes management accounting experts, including management accountants and financial managers of steel companies, and accounting professors who have conducted research on environmental issues. The sampling method is purposeful and selective. The statistical sample was 13 experts in the qualitative section and 35 experts in the quantitative section to validate the research model. In relation to the environmental accounting model of steel companies with a multifaceted grounded theory approach, two dimensions, four components, and thirty-five indicators were identified. The intra-organizational dimension of green accounting was identified with an individual component and an organizational component, and the extra-organizational dimension of green accounting was identified with a social component and a monitoring and evaluation component. The above research, conducted in the field of environmental accounting for steel companies, can help develop management tools, performance indicators, and environmental reporting methods, which in turn will guide the steel industry towards greater sustainability and responsibility. This research can also help improve the environmental performance of the steel industry.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

: Environmental Accounting
Steel Companies
Grounded Theory
Green Accounting
Alkisher, A. O. (2018). Overview of drivers behind environmental management accounting (EMA). Journal of Economics and Political Science, 12(12), 232-269. file:///C:/Users/ENGINEER/Downloads/8%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%8A232-269.pdf
Deegan, C. (2014). An overview of legitimacy theory as applied within the social and environmental accounting literature. Sustainability accounting and accountability, 248-272. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848419-28.
Goldkuhl, G., Cronholm, S. (2010). Adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory: Toward multi-grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(2), 187-205.  https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900205
Hariri, N. (2006). Principles and Methods of Qualitative Research, First Edition, Tehran, Islamic Azad University, Research Sciences Branch. https://opac.nlai.ir/opac-prod/bibliographic/912432
Iredele, O. O., Tankiso, M., & Adelowotan, M. O. (2020). The influence of institutional isomorphism and organizational factors on environmental management accounting practices of listed Nigerian and South African firms. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 34(3), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2019.1675254.
Ismail, M. S., Ramli, A., & Darus, F. (2014). Environmental management accounting practices and Islamic corporate social responsibility compliance: evidence from ISO14001 companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.043.
Khan, P. A., & Johl, S. K. (2019). Nexus of comprehensive green innovation, environmental management system-14001-2015 and firm performance. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1691833. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1691833.
Khalkhali, M.(2025), Investigating the Role of Environmental Management Accounting and Environmental Knowledge Management Practices on the Company's Environmental Performance. audit knowledge 2025; 24 (97) :86-114. [in persian] http://danesh.dmk.ir/article-1-3251-fa.html
Le, T. T., Nguyen, T. M. A., & Phan, T. T. H. (2019). Environmental management accounting and performance efficiency in the Vietnamese construction material industry—A managerial implication for sustainable development. Sustainability, 11(19), 5152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195152.
Li, M., Tian, A., Li, S., & Qi, X. (2018). Evaluating the quality of enterprise environmental accounting information disclosure. Sustainability, 10(7), 2136. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072136.
Mokhtar, N., Jusoh, R., & Zulkifli, N. (2016). Corporate characteristics and environmental management accounting (EMA) implementation: evidence from Malaysian public listed companies (PLCs). Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.085.
Molaiebirgani, F. , Salehi, A. K. , basirat, M. and kaab omeir, A. (2025). Presenting an interpretative model of competitive values of green accounting in Tehran Stock Exchange - an analysis based on Q method. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 14(54), 89-110. [in persian]   https://www.jmaak.ir/article_23569.html
Nazaripour, M. and Zakizadeh, B. (2023). The Impact of Environmental Management Accounting Practices on Minimizing Plastic Pollutions. Green Development Management Studies, 2(2), 186-206. [in persian]  https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2024.7131.1063
Nathaniel, S. P., Yalçiner, K., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: Linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS. Resources Policy, 70, 101924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101924.
Nourahmadi, M. and Parsi, F. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Green Accounting and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometrix Methode. Empirical Research in Accounting, 15(2), 211-238. [in persian] https://doi.org/10.22051/jera.2025.50235.3512
Ofoegbu, G. N., Odoemelam, N., & Okafor, R. G. (2018). Corporate board characteristics and environmental disclosure quantity: Evidence from South Africa (integrated reporting) and Nigeria (traditional reporting). Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1551510. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1551510.
Osanlou,N. and Esmaili Khatibani,M. H. (2025). Investigating the impact of environmental, social and corporate governance on green innovation of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, considering the mediating role of financial constraints and environmental awareness of managers. Strategic Management Accounting, 2(3), 1-24. [in persian]  https://doi.org/10.22034/smajournal.2025.544479.1132
Qian, W., Burritt, R., & Monroe, G. (2011). Environmental management accounting in local government: A case of waste management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(1), 93–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571111098072.
Saghafi, A. and Parsapoor, M. (2025). Examining Impact of Accounting Data Analysis with Generative AI on the Quality of Digital Sustainability Reporting with the Mediating Role of Green Sustainability Internal Control System. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 12(1), 1-31. [in persian] https://jfak.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_3739.html
Sajjadirad,T. and Darabi,R. (2025). The Impact of ESG Performance on Financing Costs with the Moderating Role of Green Financing. Strategic Management Accounting, 2(3), 87-110. [in persian]  https://doi.org/10.22034/smajournal.2025.538173.1101
Seyed nezhad fahim, S. R. (2025). Analyzing the role of strategic management accounting on sustainable supply chain management (case of study: food production companies and factories in Gilan province). Green Development Management Studies, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 21 February. [in persian]  https://doi.org/10.22077/jgdms.2024.7978.1177
Scott, K.W., Howell, D.(2008). Clarifying analysis and interpretation in grounded theory:using a conditional relationship guide and reflective coding matrix. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(2), 1-15.  https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700201
Sotudeh,R. and Mirshekari,M. (2025). Explaining the Investment Development Model with Emphasis on the Management Accounting Unit. Strategic Management Accounting, 2(4), 1-21. [in persian]  https://doi.org/10.22034/smajournal.2026.572829.1287
Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research; Grounded theory procedures and techniques. (2nd ed) Sage Publications, Inc.  https://www.amazon.com/Basics-Qualitative-Research-Techniques-Procedures/dp/0803959400
Wachira, M. M., & Wang’ombe, D. (2019). The Application of environmental management accounting techniques by manufacturing firms in Kenya. In Environmental Reporting and Management in Africa, In Environmental reporting and management in Africa, 8(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-359820190000008004.
Wang, S., Wang, H., Wang, J., & Yang, F. (2020). Does environmental information disclosure contribute to improve firm financial performance? An examination of the underlying mechanism. Science of the Total Environment, 714, 136855.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136855.